Re: Bug #20308 (Feature Request)

On November 27, 2002 04:45 pm, Sara "Pollita" Golemon wrote: > That was one of the comments I was looking for "Is this really necessary?" > After all the user can certainly use explode() to take it apart. I'm not > against giving him that answer, it was just a quick patch to write... > > Is that a -1 then? Yup, -1 from me. > > > I am not so sure that adding special cases for things like mailto: > > and > > so on is a good idea. The code works identically to how it worked in > > 4.2.3 and prior. > > > > Ilia > > > > On November 27, 2002 04:19 pm, Sara "Pollita" Golemon wrote: > >> While waiting for opinions on Bug#20460 I went ahead and addressed > >> #20308. > >> > >> User complains that parse_url returns the full email address in 'path' > >> element. Makes reference to documents which claim it should return > >> 'user' and 'host' element. > >> > >> To address this request and maintain backward compatability I wrote a > >> patch to split the 'path' element in to 'host' and > >> 'user' elements > >> then return all three. > >> > >> Ex: > >> *current behavior* > >> > >> print_r(parse_url("mailto:pollita@php.net")); > >> Array ( > >> [scheme] => mailto > >> [path] => pollita@php.net > >> } > >> > >> *new behavior* > >> > >> print_r(parse_url("mailto:pollita@php.net")); > >> Array ( > >> [scheme] => mailto > >> [path] => pollita@php.net > >> [user] => pollita > >> [host] => php.net > >> } > >> > >> If there are no objections I'll commit this change.