Re: Bug #20308 (Feature Request)
| From: | Sara Golemon | Date: | Fri, 29 Nov 2002 17:41:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Bug #20308 (Feature Request) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-91928@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
>> It looks like php_url_parse can be modified to return user and host
>> for mailto schemes without making it a 'special case', but that would
>> also remove the current 'path' index which would break existing PHP
>> code ((bad)).
>>
>> So we can (A) put in a special case, or (B) not modify the function at
>> all. Either way leaves someone unhappy so in the absence of a
>> majority I can't help but do nothing. This request will have to
>> remain open, at least for now.
>
> Users requests all kinds of features all the time, just because someone
> will be unhappy because their request is not implemented is hardly a
> reason to implement it. As a rule, special cases are bad, if you REALLY
> think this is useful functionality we are better off adding a
> parse_email() function, who's job would be to break email addresses
> into parts.
>
I'm not so much worried about the user in this case, a few explodes will
keep them happy. I'm more worried about the behavior of parse_url being
just plain lacking. mailto:pollita@php.net?subject=Bug+20308 should
be
entitled to everybit as much parsing as
http://joe:blow@www.php.net/pathto/somepage?var=value
The ONLY real concern here, and reason for not fixing php_url_parse, comes
in the fact that 'path' would no longer contain
'pollita@php.net?subject=Bug+20308' (per the example above) which would
likely break existing scripts.
Perhaps the compromise is to create a new function 'parse_url_rfc' (name
could be better) which behaves correctly (without having special cases).
Then add a note to the manpage for parse_url saying to use parse_url_rfc
instead, and eventually depricate parse_url (perhaps with PHP 5.0).
-Pollita