Re: New SNMP function names
| From: | Dan Kalowsky | Date: | Wed, 04 Dec 2002 14:10:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New SNMP function names | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-92067@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
+1 for me
Although I do remember the reasoning for it, it doesn't mean I like the use of the snmpv3 naming scheme either. So if anyone has any better suggestions for these, I'd still like to hear them.
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 08:49 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
Hello, while browsing the CVS I found that the following functions were added to the CVS recently:+ PHP_FE(snmpv3get, NULL) + PHP_FE(snmpv3walk, NULL) + PHP_FE(snmpv3realwalk, NULL) + PHP_FALIAS(snmpv3walkoid, snmpv3realwalk, NULL) + PHP_FE(snmpv3set, NULL)But those functionnames don't adhere to our nameing guidelines. As those are new functions I propose to change them to the following, to be more consistent with all other functions:snmpv3get -> snmp3_get snmpv3walk -> snmp3_walksnmpv3realwalk -> snmp3_real_walk (or snmp3_walk_oid)snmpv3set -> snmp3_getalso, there is no need to introduce an alias for a newly created function so I guess we just should drop it. I'd like to make those proposed changes ASAP as they are also added in the PHP_4_3 branch which gets closer to release everyday. regards, Derick -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ JDI Media Solutions http://www.jdimedia.nl/ PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals http://php-mag.net/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php ---------------------------------------------------------------<Dan Kalowsky "Cause fear is strong and love's
http://www.deadmime.org/~dank for everyone, who isn't me." dank-nom@aps-deadmime.org - "Burden In My Hand", kalowsky@php.net Soundgarden