RE: [PHP-DOC] list of contributors [rethought]
| From: | Andrew Lindeman | Date: | Sat, 03 May 2003 19:17:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DOC] list of contributors [rethought] | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969353099@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 14:13, Erica Douglass wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steph [mailto:sfox@php.net]
> Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2003 1:09 PM
> To: Gabor Hojtsy; phpdoc@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] list of contributors [rethought]
>
> > 5. We should have a long list on a 'credits page', (4) implies this.
> > But do we need a main authors list as the GTK manual has one for
> > example?
>
> You keep talking about the GTK manual, and I'm still sitting here
> wondering what to do about our own contributors :)
>
> You seem to have found a good solution, but I keep thinking about the
> main PHP commit stats and whether there's any way you could run your own
> 'top 10 on the front page' out of a docs equivalent held in a database
> somewhere.. it'd be eternally changing, but would give everybody an
> equal opportunity to shine ;)
>
> -------
>
> Amen. I'd contribute to the PHP manual a lot more if I knew that every
> contribution meant that I would get listed higher on the list.
>
> I say: start by listing everyone who is on the PHP-DOC team that has had
> more than, say, 5 commits (some arbitrarily low number, but more than
> one.) List them in order of the number of commits they have had. Then
> put the top 5 or 10 on the front page, along with a short list of the
> leaders of the PHP-DOC team.
>
> I think this is a great way to encourage participation, and it will make
> the manual an even nicer part of PHP. Of course, you would have to watch
> out for spurious one-line commits, but I think we're all pretty mature
> here.
>
> Erica Douglass
> Lead Web Developer
> Simpli, Inc.
The bug database did something similar at one stage with bug closers. I
don't think a commit count, however, is an accurate idea of how much a
person contributed, nor is it something I really want to see in the
manual -- it's not really a contest! I think that recognizing people
who need to be recognized (see Goba's original post) is enough. We
don't need to have some sort of 'Top 10 Committers' list, IMHO.
--
Andrew Lindeman <alindeman@php.net>