Re: list of contributors [rethought]

> > > It doesn't seem to be too difficult to get those persons? ;-) > > > Am I right only two persons, Goba and Philip nomintated themself? > > > > > > The rest of the mails was mainly dealing with the process how to list > > > contributors? > > > > If we're nominating people, then I would enjoy being a part of this > > group also, as I have been contributing for a while, and don't intend to > > stop any time soon :) > > AFAIK we don't have any established groups, what group do > you mean? If you're talking about authors I don't feel you've > contributed enough to be part of this group but of course as > time passes that can change ;) So as of today I'm -1 for this. > Most likely we'll have other groups and when that time comes > you'll be in one of them. I thought that it was clear, and it was discussed that we no more speak about authors, but contributors, which is a much wider range. Once again, if we are speaking about authors, I would not like to be listed, as I don't consider myself an author. As it was written in the letter I started this whole discussion with, I am kind of a 'technical editor' which may not be the best name, but I don't know a better name for it. Goba