Re: Translation and new doc-style

> >>> I know that at least the Hungarian translators do that: > >>> > >>> - look up diff of English file (from revcheck) > >>> - change the Hungarian file according to the diff > >>> > >>> If the diff contains irrelevant changes (ws), it is getting harder. > >>> If ws is done in a separate commit, it can be steped over (with > >>> incremental diffing). > >> > >> > >> Sure, but for the new doc style the WS-changes are relevant, no? > > > > > > Probably a lot less people care about WS in the translations, it does > > not matter. > > If it does not matter, why should these WS fixes be done in the en tree? > > Just curiously asking To keep the whitespace consistent in the manual. Why the old docs start at column #2 makes no sense, I think it was simply left over from the banana split though... Regards, Philip