Re: Nginx Installation on Unix systems

Also, there is a type for pcre, spelled and linked as prce. On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Stelian Mocanita <stelian.mocanita@gmail.com > wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The fine people at nginx have their self hosted repos for latest stable > and even development mode, and I personally think we should only link to > that (http://wiki.nginx.org/Install). Having a full blown "compile it > yourself" in the docs will require maintenance on our part which is rather > pointless since the nginx people are already doing it. > > Another point I want to raise is that if people do follow the compile > guide, they will only get the core nginx, which is rather lite for current > requirements and it would generate questions from users most likely. > > Regardsm > Stelian > > > > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Hannes Magnusson < > hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Jacob Clark <iamjacobclark@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > 1) When building Nginx from source you are able to be more precise >> > over the type of binary you require, for example, is it possible to >> > specify at compile time that you do not require the HTTP module, but >> > only require the MAIL module. >> > >> > Or you may specify that you require the HTTP module with no other >> > modules apart from the core module. >> > >> > The other advantage is actually acquiring the most up to date version, >> > it's generally the case that most distributions distribute older >> > versions of Nginx. >> >> Correct. It is the best way to get the latest of gratest nginx, but at >> the same time, it is also the best way to guarantee that you will >> never ever ever ever upgrade it either. >> >> I don't think this is something we should be recommending. >> >> >> > 4) I am moving the php-fpm binary from the downloaded raw source to >> > the /usr/local/bin as this is where subsequent php binaries are >> > transferred too, it makes sense to move this also. >> >> >> Shouldn't that be done with the correct install paths? >> Am I missing something silly here? >> >> -Hannes >> > >