Re: Nginx Installation on Unix systems
| From: | Jacob Clark | Date: | Wed, 08 Jan 2014 01:31:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Nginx Installation on Unix systems | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969384801@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi all,
I have modified the patch to address the above discussions:
https://edit.php.net/index.php?patchID=1098&project=PHP
Thanks
Jacob.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Jacob Clark <iamjacobclark@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stelian/Hannes,
>
> I think this is a fair point, I will re-work the 'Getting Nginx'
> section to point in the direction of the Nginx Wiki.
>
> As for moving the php-fpm binary there is currently no flag available
> during ./configure to specify where the php-fpm binary is installed to
> as far as I'm aware.
>
> The current live Apache 2.x setup manual
> (http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.unix.apache2.php) also follows
> the same procedure of moving the php.ini file after the binaries have
> been built.
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Stelian Mocanita
> <stelian.mocanita@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> The fine people at nginx have their self hosted repos for latest stable and
>> even development mode, and I personally think we should only link to that
>> (http://wiki.nginx.org/Install). Having a full blown "compile it yourself"
>> in the docs will require maintenance on our part which is rather pointless
>> since the nginx people are already doing it.
>>
>> Another point I want to raise is that if people do follow the compile guide,
>> they will only get the core nginx, which is rather lite for current
>> requirements and it would generate questions from users most likely.
>>
>> Regardsm
>> Stelian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Hannes Magnusson
>> <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Jacob Clark <iamjacobclark@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > 1) When building Nginx from source you are able to be more precise
>>> > over the type of binary you require, for example, is it possible to
>>> > specify at compile time that you do not require the HTTP module, but
>>> > only require the MAIL module.
>>> >
>>> > Or you may specify that you require the HTTP module with no other
>>> > modules apart from the core module.
>>> >
>>> > The other advantage is actually acquiring the most up to date version,
>>> > it's generally the case that most distributions distribute older
>>> > versions of Nginx.
>>>
>>> Correct. It is the best way to get the latest of gratest nginx, but at
>>> the same time, it is also the best way to guarantee that you will
>>> never ever ever ever upgrade it either.
>>>
>>> I don't think this is something we should be recommending.
>>>
>>>
>>> > 4) I am moving the php-fpm binary from the downloaded raw source to
>>> > the /usr/local/bin as this is where subsequent php binaries are
>>> > transferred too, it makes sense to move this also.
>>>
>>>
>>> Shouldn't that be done with the correct install paths?
>>> Am I missing something silly here?
>>>
>>> -Hannes
>>
>>