Re: Re: weekly doc builds

From: Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:34:21 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: weekly doc builds
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.doc php.webmaster 
Request: Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969385126@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
2014.08.29. 18:23 ezt írta ("Peter Cowburn" <petercowburn@gmail.com>): > > > > > On 29 August 2014 17:11, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > yesterday I had to rebuild the docs on rsync.php.net so we got some php >> > 5.6.0 related doc fixed out sooner than the weekly build today, and I'm just >> > wondering if there is still a reason to only rebuild the documentation on >> > once a week. >> > a successful build seems to take about 40 minutes, and we currently have 11 >> > active languages, so the full rebuild (when all langs can be built >> > successfuly, yesterday we had 6 broken lang, pt_BR, zh, de, it, ru, tr) >> > takes about 7.3 hours. >> > >> > and here comes my question: is there any reason why should we just rebuild >> > the docs every day? >> > http://docs.php.net/ seems to be able to handle that >> > just fine for years >> > now. >> >> >> >> The rsync server isn't exactly state-of-the-art, also pushing out gb >> of updates every day will amplify the bandwidth issue it already has. > > > Wasn't there also a plan to move the actual building of the docs off of the rsync box? We could stick it on a nice, beefy docs build server... assuming there's such a machine just lying around doing nothing. Good idea, we could even use the result of the build from the docs.php.net server, that would even end up saving time and processing power.

« previous php.doc (#969385126) next »