Re: Re: weekly doc builds

On 29 August 2014 17:34, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2014.08.29. 18:23 ezt írta ("Peter Cowburn" <petercowburn@gmail.com>): > > > > > > > > > > > On 29 August 2014 17:11, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > yesterday I had to rebuild the docs on rsync.php.net so we got some > php > >> > 5.6.0 related doc fixed out sooner than the weekly build today, and > I'm just > >> > wondering if there is still a reason to only rebuild the > documentation on > >> > once a week. > >> > a successful build seems to take about 40 minutes, and we currently > have 11 > >> > active languages, so the full rebuild (when all langs can be built > >> > successfuly, yesterday we had 6 broken lang, pt_BR, zh, de, it, ru, > tr) > >> > takes about 7.3 hours. > >> > > >> > and here comes my question: is there any reason why should we just > rebuild > >> > the docs every day? > >> > http://docs.php.net/ seems to be able to handle > >> > that just fine for > years > >> > now. > >> > >> > >> > >> The rsync server isn't exactly state-of-the-art, also pushing out gb > >> of updates every day will amplify the bandwidth issue it already has. > > > > > > Wasn't there also a plan to move the actual building of the docs off of > the rsync box? We could stick it on a nice, beefy docs build server... > assuming there's such a machine just lying around doing nothing. > > Good idea, we could even use the result of the build from the docs.php.net > server, that would even end up saving time and processing power. > Considering we also need a Windows machine to build the CHMs, is it worth (and I truly feel your collective shivers) that the Doc building box be windows? That way, only 1 box to build all the doxs? -- Richard Quadling