Re: Re: Current state of my ideas on moving docs to GIT

From: Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 21:18:31 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Current state of my ideas on moving docs to GIT
References: 1 2  Groups: php.doc 
Request: Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969386786@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Christoph. Am 10.11.17 um 20:19 schrieb Christoph M. Becker: > On 04.11.2017 at 15:46, Andreas Heigl wrote: > >> What did I do so far to investigate ways of moving the PHP-Docs from SVN >> to GIT: > > Thanks for your work, Andreas! > >> The most important change probably is the revcheck.php-file. As the >> en-repository and the de-repository are now two separate repositories I >> needed to do some git-hacks to get the information about how many >> commits there have been between the translated and the base file. And >> there is definitely room for improvement! I'm looking forward to your ideas! > > I'm not sure whether this info is really needed. When going to sync > with EN, I usually check the SVN log of EN, so I quickly get this info. > And frankly, it does not really matter if a translation is a single > commit or many commits behinds; in both cases it is out-dated, and even > a single commit might have more modifications than a lot of commits in > total. Works at the moment and as I tried to keep the current workflow as it is ATM I had to change that script. Whether we continue using it or not is a completely different decission and should IMHO not be related to moving the VCS to git. > >> * How shall we reach a decission on how to go on from here? Is an RFC >> the right approach? Or is there some other form of finding a decission? > > That is *the* question! I'm part of the doc team only for a few years, > and during this time only "minor" changes have been made, and these have > been *informally* discussed and decided on this list. Guess, we need > more input from others, especially translators, who might be affected > heavily by this change (e.g. the Brasilian Portuguese team is using a > SVN/Git bridge[1]). I wrote this email 5 days ago and until now didn't get much reply. So I assume people are fine with the idea… > Also we have to discuss and decide what happens > with edit.php.net. Personally I'd say that we don't need edit.php.net any more as people can now easily create new PRs on GitHub. Edit.php.net is a great tool to allow people without karma to edit the docs and create a patch, but after moving to git that can be done equaly easy using GitHub-PullRequests. Cheers Andreas -- ,,, (o o) +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ | Andreas Heigl | | mailto:andreas@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" | | http://andreas.heigl.org http://hei.gl/wiFKy7 | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://hei.gl/root-ca | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+

Attachment: [application/pgp-keys] 0x5BFCE472.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
« previous php.doc (#969386786) next »