Re: Please stop anonymous login to edit.php.net
| From: | Christoph M. Becker | Date: | Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:27:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Please stop anonymous login to edit.php.net | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969387928@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 26.04.2021 at 19:19, André L F S Bacci wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 2:26 PM Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
> wrote:
>
>> On 26.04.2021 at 15:06, Sergey Panteleev wrote:
>>
>>> I can't say about other languages,
>>> but I currently use the editor only to track changes.
>>>
>>> George started to change the revcheck section [1],
>>> but it seems now the script is still taking data from git.php.net, not
>> GitHub.
>>>
>>> If we can track the changes on that site, then there is no point in the
>> editor (although I really like it).
>>>
>>> Also, if you look at the authorization history at edit.php.net, not
>> many people go there.
>>>
>>> Does it make sense to restore the editor to work for everyone,
>>> or is it better to direct efforts to finish and deploy the new revcheck?
>>>
>>> [1] http://doc.php.gpb.moe/tools/revcheck/
>>
>> Well, it seems the refcheck has been updated to also allow to check
>> Github[1], although I'm not sure whether that update will be used on the
>> server automatically.
>
> doc-base/scripts/revcheck.php and web-doc/www/revcheck.php are two separate
> entities. The first is a text only, local only script and the other is db
> based (as I remember) web script.
Ah, thanks! I wasn't really aware that these are different scripts.
> So... no. It's possible to use the new algos from doc-base version to
> recreate a fast web-doc script, but it will need a local git checkout of
> GitHub repositories.
>
> Anyhow, I think we should work on revcheck (if there's the need for more
>> work), and decide afterwards what to do with edit.php.net. :)
>
> It's necessary to qualify what one you are asking... the doc-base one or
> the web-doc one.
In this case it is about the web-doc script, since this is likely the
one users otherwise using edit.php.net would use.
> The doc-base only has been receiving updates, slowly making him back to his
> former glory, as it is heavily used by translators who prefer command line.
> The web-doc one, focused on translators on the web, will suffer more from
> the lack of capacity to generate individual file diffs in a consistent
> manner.
--
Christoph M. Becker