Re: HTML vs. PHP

Well you can check the archives, but the consensus seems to be that it is better to escape out of html with your php. I use a combination of both - I usually echo out form code for example, that won't be touched by designers, but escape for other stuff. As for cpu usage, bare text goes straight to the browser, so the php interpreter does not have to do that. Escaping is slightly faster. ----- Original Message ----- From: Martin A. Marques <martin@math.unl.edu.ar> To: Radu Filip <radu@tuiasi.ro> Cc: <php-general@lists.php.net> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 11:31 AM Subject: Re: [PHP] HTML vs. PHP > On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Radu Filip wrote: > > > One simple reason: if every page written in php include a single php file > > that draws every page, you can change the entire deisgn of the site by > > modifing a single file. > > > > Another reason: I usually create pages both in Romanian and English. Is > > simplier to have a page like page.php?lang=ro (or lang=en) that display > > the body in Romanian or English than have two pages with the same design > > architecture. > > What I really want to know is if one is more optimal then the other, in > terms of memory and CPU consumption. > > > > "And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Martín Marqués email: martin@math.unl.edu.ar > Santa Fe - Argentina http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/ > Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >