RE: [PHP] OOP vs procedural

From: Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 14:49:07 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP] OOP vs procedural
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-146677@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I have a question on OOP. What you guys are using for calling functions withing class? I am putting functions in class and calling it by classname::function name (place where there is no need to create an object). Is it the correct way to calling it? I thought there is no need to allocate memory for the object of class. Please give your thoughts. Thanks Hardik --- Martin Towell <martin.towell@world.net> wrote: > I've seen only one reply to the original message, so > here's my 2c worth > > I use OO to prevent too many global variables > floating around the place. In > this company, there's 1,000's of globals, and very > often they interfere with > each other. I am (with the help with someone else) > trying to move all the > core code to use OO so we don't have this problem. > > I think that there's a place for both styles. > Self-contained functions can > stay by themselves, functions that interact with > each other naturally lend > themselves to objects... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Info@Best-IT [mailto:info@best-it.biz] > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 1:59 AM > To: PHP general > Subject: [PHP] OOP vs procedural > > > Between these 2 styles of writing PHP which is > better usually: > > C-style, using include files containing paths to > libraries? > > Object Oriented: everything is structures with class > files? > > Thanks, > /T > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com

« previous php.general (#146677) next »