RE: [PHP] OOP vs procedural
| From: | Hardik Doshi | Date: | Wed, 07 May 2003 20:26:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] OOP vs procedural | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-146732@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thanks for your feedback.
Hardik
--- Ernest E Vogelsinger <ernest@vogelsinger.at>
wrote:
> At 16:49 07.05.2003, Hardik Doshi spoke out and
> said:
> --------------------[snip]--------------------
> >I have a question on OOP.
> >
> >What you guys are using for calling functions
> withing
> >class? I am putting functions in class and calling
> it
> >by classname::function name (place where there is
> no
> >need to create an object). Is it the correct way to
> >calling it? I thought there is no need to allocate
> >memory for the object of class.
> >
> >Please give your thoughts.
> --------------------[snip]--------------------
>
> This is a valid method and used widely in other oop
> languages as well.
> Class methods that do not necessarily need an object
> instance (they lack a
> valid $this object) are called static methods. You
> can always call a static
> methods as classname::methodname(params).
>
> Differing to "real" OOP languages, PHP doesn't have
> the capability of
> declaring static class methods, you need to work
> this out yourself. You may
> always check for the $this variable; usually when it
> exists (isset) then
> the object has been called non-static.
>
> I say "usually" because if any object instance calls
> another class method
> in a static way, the $this variable will propagate
> into the static method -
> unfortunately. Hope this will change with PHP5.
>
>
> --
> >O Ernest E. Vogelsinger
> (\) ICQ #13394035
> ^ http://www.vogelsinger.at/
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com