Re: Re: posting variables to parent frame

On 4/26/07, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote:

On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 19:17 +0200, Tijnema ! wrote: On 4/26/07, tedd <tedd@sperling.com> wrote:

At 5:26 PM +0200 4/26/07, Tijnema ! wrote:

On 4/26/07, tedd <tedd@sperling.com> wrote:

At 5:06 PM +0200 4/26/07, Tijnema ! wrote:

It's not XHTML 1.0 Strict valid .. :P You're page is HTML 4.01 valid, i think you should make it XHTML 1.0 Strict.

Argggg. Then I would have to add all those "/" to my ">" in all my code in all my sites. Literally millions of new "/" would have to be added. That act could possibly crash the net. So, until someone points out a good reason for me to change (I'm open for redirection), I'll continue to use what works for me. Besides, it's still compliant, isn't it? Cheers, tedd

HTML 4.01 will become deprecated earlier then XHTML 1.0 :) That's all i know :P Tijnema

And tedd will become deprecated earlier than teddd -- I can wait. Besides, when HTML 4.01 finally does, someone will make a parser that will fix everything. Cheers, tedd

Hmm, if that is gonna work completly, i want to see :P Look how many things are deprecated/removed in XHTML 1.0 Strict v HTML 4.01 A lot things have been replaced with styles in XHTML 1.0 Strict. I see microsoft as the first one that will ignore HTML 4.01, in IE8 maybe? So we're talking around 2012? Hell, I'll be retired by then!!! ;) Cheers, Rob.

You maybe, but not everyone (like me :P) I would love to, but well, i guess i can't stop when i'm 20 years old :) Tijnema