Re: Just to confirm...

Daniel Brown schreef: > On Dec 18, 2007 10:01 PM, Richard Lynch <ceo@l-i-e.com> wrote: >> On Tue, December 18, 2007 9:17 am, Richard Heyes wrote: >>> Emails that bounce get sent back to the address in the Return-Path: >>> header. Correct? >> Depends on who is following which standards from which era... >> >> There was an "Error-to:" header that was popular for awhile, and... >> >> I don't think you can safely assume all email clients/muas/mtas are >> going to actually follow the same standard you are reading, much less >> follow it correctly. :-) >> >> ymmv > > This is just the opinion of one asshole, mind you, but considering > how much of an asshole I am, that means my opinion *really* matters, > right? I think that any MTA or client that doesn't work with the > Reply-To header isn't worth beans. hey look everyone, a talking ***hole ;-) >