Re: Just to confirm...
| From: | Daniel Brown | Date: | Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:53:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Just to confirm... | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-266107@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Dec 19, 2007 11:18 AM, Richard Lynch <ceo@l-i-e.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, December 19, 2007 9:31 am, Richard Heyes wrote:
> >>> I think that any MTA or client that doesn't work with the
> >>> Reply-To header isn't worth beans.
> >>
> >> very very true
> >
> > Well the Reply-To: header isn't for bounces.
>
> The OP was asking about Return-path, not Reply-to
>
> Furthermore, while the MTA/client/MUA may not be worth beans, that
> doesn't mean nobody is using it.
>
> I don't think any MS products are worth beans; Yet many people are
> using them. Should I not bother to check IE compatibility?
Actual code from a live page of mine. Just because I could. ;-P
<?
if(!stristr($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'],"mozilla")) {
die("We only allow Mozilla browsers in here!\n");
}
?>
DISCLAIMER: Yes, lawyers, I'm aware that client headers can be forged.
--
Daniel P. Brown
[Phone Numbers Go Here!]
[They're Hidden From View!]
If at first you don't succeed, stick to what you know best so that you
can make enough money to pay someone else to do it for you.