Re: Just to confirm...
| From: | Stut | Date: | Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:26:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Just to confirm... | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-266112@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 11:18 AM, Richard Lynch <ceo@l-i-e.com> wrote:You could, but you didn't!! This is a typical user agent provided by IE7... Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506) All IE browsers since the beginning of time have sent a user agent containing "mozilla". -Stut -- http://stut.net/On Wed, December 19, 2007 9:31 am, Richard Heyes wrote:The OP was asking about Return-path, not Reply-to Furthermore, while the MTA/client/MUA may not be worth beans, that doesn't mean nobody is using it. I don't think any MS products are worth beans; Yet many people are using them. Should I not bother to check IE compatibility?Well the Reply-To: header isn't for bounces.I think that any MTA or client that doesn't work with the Reply-To header isn't worth beans.very very trueActual code from a live page of mine. Just because I could. ;-P<? if(!stristr($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'],"mozilla")) {die("We only allow Mozilla browsers in here!\n");} ?>