Re: Are these Truthful Proof about PHP ??

On 2/27/08, Zoltán Németh <znemeth@alterationx.hu> wrote: > 2008. 02. 27, szerda keltezéssel 10.03-kor Dare Williams ezt írta: > > Dear Developers, > > > > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx > > I read an Article on the above Microsoft website stating the reason why to Migrate from > > PHP to ASP.NET. So can you please justify this proofs from Microsoft and let everybody knows if they > > are all TRUE and MEANIFUL atall or they are just cheap lies to backup their product. Please advice? > > > > the article is from September 2003. so honestly I did not fully read it, > just scanned the main titles, because it's talking about the state of > php in 2003 (which was some v4.1 or so) - and php now is completely > different. > > the other thing is, AFAIK ASP.NET is not just a language but a > framework, which php in itself is not. if someone wanted a comparison, > he should compare with php and a php-based framework (symfony, zend, > etc) > > and the third thing is, never believe anything from microsoft ;) > > greets, > Zoltán Németh Funny, I have the exact same web page opened up from this morning, as work projects are moving me towards M$$S environments and languages. The comparisons are fairly biased against PHP, as expected from the source, and a number of links are broken, particularly the one offering 5 full applications with source code. But I do have an install of the full Visual Studio .NET, and although the sintax (sic) is not terrifically foreign to me, even small pages running locally take a looooong time to load. I'm hoping to convince the powers that be here at work that there are better alternatives... -- -David. When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace. -Jimi Hendrix