Re: Are these Truthful Proof about PHP ??

Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun language to program in way back-in-the-day. So simple! On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:39 PM, tedd <tedd.sperling@gmail.com> wrote: > At 10:03 AM -0800 2/27/08, Dare Williams wrote: > >Dear Developers, > > > > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx > > I read an Article on the above Microsoft website stating the > >reason why to Migrate from PHP to ASP.NET > ><http://asp.net/>. So can you > please justify > >this proofs from Microsoft and let everybody knows if they are all > >TRUE and MEANIFUL atall or they are just cheap lies to backup their > >product. Please advice? > > > > Thanks. > >Williams. > > > Let me understand this. > > M$ is saying that ASP.NET <http://asp.net/> is better > than PHP for web > development? > Better for whom, M$? > > Remember that M$ also claimed that all versions of IE are better than > anything else. How did that work out? I think that's one of the > biggest jokes on the net and has, unfortunately, made life for > developers miserable. > > I personally think their claim is about as accurate as their page is > standards compliant. > > > > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx!�7��L�[l6�! > � > > 77 errors! > > If they can't even write good html, then why would I trust them with > any coding advice? > > And lastly, I remember M$'s QuickBASIC and how they just dropped it > without any warning nor subsequent support. They just left QuickBASIC > developers out to dry. Believe me, if M$ can't make money from > ASP.NET <http://asp.net/>, your loyalty to their product > won't mean a > thing! > > Cheers, > > tedd > > -- > ------- > http://sperling.com > http://ancientstones.com z > ����C�Mk�撠�~http://earthstones.com > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >