Re: Are these Truthful Proof about PHP ??

On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:41 -0600, Greg Donald wrote: > On 2/27/08, Nathan Nobbe <quickshiftin@gmail.com> wrote: > > ya; rob; greg is like the new dude on the witty block; > > better pack something good for a comeback :O > > my heads still smoking while i try to think up something > > moderately so ~:( > > I'm not gonna just sit here and watch someone "*lol*" comparing the > bloated nature of ASP to PHP when I can make the _exact same > comparison_ using Ruby (and/or Rails) compared to PHP. Rob then > follows with the very predictable reply that I am somehow wrong in > comparing PHP to a "framework" rather than to a language, but then > isn't ASP, the object of Rob's "*lol*", also a framework of sorts? > Pot-kettle-black. I thought ASP was the language and .NET was the framework. Maybe I'm wrong, but I pointed out that glaring issue when I mentioned GD and ImageMagick versus the .NET image lib. And the target of my *lol* was the whole question of comparison... the outdated document, the obvious ugliness of ASP code, the FUD, etc, etc. So is ASP really a framework? Did I get that wrong... I'm not always right you know, especially about MS crap. Thanks for letting me know I'm predictable BTW, I wouldn't want to surprise. Cheers, Rob. -- .------------------------------------------------------------. | InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com | :------------------------------------------------------------: | An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting | | a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services | | such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn | | also provides an extremely flexible architecture for | | creating re-usable components quickly and easily. | `------------------------------------------------------------'