Re: What's wrong the __autoload()?

From: Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:17:45 +0000
Subject: Re: What's wrong the __autoload()?
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-271408@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 3/12/08, Richard Heyes <richardh@phpguru.org> wrote: > No it's not. It's not like require_once() is a hassle to type/use > anyhow. Things like editor macros and templates help out enormously and > by using them over __auto load you (a business) could save yourself a > lot of time and hence money. I'm not defending __autoload() specifically, I don't do much OO PHP anyway so I couldn't possibly care less about it. My argument is that asking other developers to not use specific language features simply because lesser developers may not know them very well is just plain dumb. I'm sorry you don't get it and I'm done trying to help you get it. Good luck codling your lesser developers. May they never learn jack on their own. *sigh* -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/

« previous php.general (#271408) next »