Re: What's wrong the __autoload()?
| From: | Greg Donald | Date: | Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:23:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: What's wrong the __autoload()? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-271818@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 3/13/08, Andrés Robinet <agrobinet@bestplace.biz> wrote:
> Sorry dude, RoR is still an academic toy.
Wrong.
I've worked with a team of 12 or so Ruby/Rails developers rewriting a
Java/Oracle electronic medical record to use Rails/PostgreSQL instead.
Hundreds of tables in a real-life app for real-world electronic
medical records. I have 6 significant Rails projects of my own I
still work on and maintain. None of those are in acedemia.
But in academia, just in the last 6 months I've rolled out a heart
drug study for young heart surgery patients. The app services 21
university medical centers worldwide. It uses Oracle and has around
60+ tables. I alone coded the app in about 6 weeks.
Currently I'm working on another drug study with two other developers,
again in Rails using Oracle.
What you call a toy I call the most useful tool I've ever had the
pleasure of using.
> And not the most successful one, since
> I've heard people talking like you back in 2005. Ruby on Rails is not new and
> has not proved anything yet.
Obviously not everyone is smart enough to know an excellent tool when
they see one.
> It's an arrogant language,
No, it's an OO language, and a much better OO implementation than
anything else available, except perhaps C++.
> so much arrogant that its community pretend it can
> fix the world.
That's not _my_ claim. But I surely wouldn't have PHP, or any of the
Rails clone frameworks written in it, appearing at the top of my
available technologies list.
> Back in 2005 I was very enthusiastic and thought it could have a
> future, but after confirming what other poster said "the RoR community is
> insane", I didn't give a f... anymore.
They're not insane, just excited to have better tools.
> I believe it will become some piece of *enterprise-class* piece of dust in the
> best of scenarios.
I, of course, do not.
> In the meantime, the web moves towards PHP more and more.
Stats to back up your claim? The last time I looked at the Apache
module stats, mod_php was on the decline.
> Look at it this way, in 2001 M$ released the .Net Framework. It's been 7 YEARS
> since PHP is STILL the leader and will be so for many more years. And .Net has
> the "glorious" Visual Studio IDE, compiled code, built-in caching, and
> idiot-proof tools, and has the BIGGEST software company behind. Do you think
> that the work of "a man" can do much more than that? Specially, a man that has
> the arrogance of a big Co.?
Pointing to a company and their many failures in no way makes PHP a
better tool than Ruby and Rails.
> "In March 2007 David Heinemeier Hansson filed three Rails related trademark
> applications to the USPTO. These applications regard the phrase "RUBY ON RAILS",
> the word "RAILS" and the official Rails logo. As a consequence, in the summer of
> 2007 Hansson denied to Apress the permission to use the Rails logo on the cover
> of a new Rails book written by some authoritative community members. The episode
> gave rise to a polite protest in the Rails community. In response to this
> criticism, Hansson made the following claims:
> <quote>
> I only grant promotional use [of the Rails logo] for products I'm directly
> involved with. Such as books that I've been part of the development process for
> or conferences where I have a say in the execution. I would most definitely seek
> to enforce all the trademarks of Rails
> </quote>
How is that any fucking different than Rasmus himself contacting me in
1999 telling me I had to rename my PHPLinks project because I wasn't
associated with the PHP project itself? Pot-kettle-black.
> Sorry, even if it was the ONE AND ONLY programming language... I will dismiss it
> until it becomes a "business need", as I don't even trust its creator. PHP is
> easy to deal with, it's free... and IT GETS THE JOB DONE. You mentioned
> something about projects done on RoR you can share... why don't you show us your
> PHP work instead?
This URL lists my many open source PHP projects:
http://destiney.com/php
Where are yours?
Here are many (PHP) sites I've worked on in the past few years:
Centerstone Behavioral Health - http://centerstone.org/
Med Center Today - http://medcentertoday.com/
Caste Contractors - http://castlecontractors.com/
Filmhouse.com - http://filmhouse.com/
EZsweeps - http://ezsweeps.com/
LuckyShop - http://ezsweeps.com/shoppingnew.php
> Maybe you like RoR more because you suck at PHP.
Maybe you're a fucking retard.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/