Re: Re: A Little Something.

From: Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 19:36:30 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: A Little Something.
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-274206@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
At 3:11 PM -0400 5/12/08, Eric Butera wrote:
NoScript is a FireFox extension to protect users from malicious scripts.
NoScript is also a tag for browsers to read and react to IF they do not accept javascript. http://www.w3schools.com/TAGS/tag_noscript.asp That's an unfortunate naming convention from FireFox. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/722
JS is indeed very dangerous right now especially as mashups continue to gain popularity and all of that personal information floating around. Subscribe to planet websecurity and see the truth. The way I deal with urchin is by /etc/hosts'ing out google's adservers. Then we all win, right? ;) Here is a fairly current rant: http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-TBPekxc1dLNy5DOloPfzVvFIVOWMB0li?p=819
Okay, I read that -- but what does that have to do with urchin? Urchin is not an ad delivery system, but rather a way to keep track of visitors to your web site. Now, how is that a security threat? Or is the claim that any site that uses js is a security threat? Cheers, tedd -- ------- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com

« previous php.general (#274206) next »