Re: Re: A Little Something.

Stut wrote:

On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote:

tedd wrote:

Hi gang: This is what I did this morning: http://webbytedd.com/bb/tribute/ It speaks for itself. Cheers, tedd

tedd, Nothing to do with the subject matter, but I noticed because it is one of your more simple pages: I get a JS "urchinTracker() not defined" error on your site, almost certainly because NoScript is blocking UrchinTracker... Perhaps you should wrap that naked call to urchinTracker() in a conditional - maybe as simple as

    if (urchinTracker) urchinTracker();

<pet-peeve> I really hate seeing JS errors on published sites (i.e. not development sandboxes) </pet-peeve> 'course, there are many sites that make the same call to urchinTracker(), and many many worse errors...

I see your pet peeve and I'll raise you one of mine... <pet-peeve> People who use Javascript blockers, especially Javascript blockers that do a half-arsed job which causes errors. </pet-peeve> If you're going to block Javascript, block it. Don't use something that tries (and apparently fails) to block it intelligently. What are you so afraid of? -Stut My main pet peeve is when my wife leaves empty clothes hangers on door knobs throughout the house.

-Shawn