Re: Interntet Explorer 8 beater 2
| From: | Colin Guthrie | Date: | Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:58:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Interntet Explorer 8 beater 2 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-279713@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Ross McKay wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:I somehow doubt it, but that would be nice. I certainly wouldn't have any moral qualms about it, but not sure if MS lawyers would see it lat way. That said, if you use a VM system that support snapshots, then you can have a faily convenient sacrificial install that you can play with this kind of thing. That said, it's still not useful. [Edit: I see you wrote pretty much the same thing at the end of your mail ;)]how do you handle licensing/activation in these VMs? I have parallels on my Mac and a 'proper' bootcamp install of WinXP which I need for work ... and I'm not about to screw with that install for the sake of testing another POS version of IE.You need a license for each instance of XP that you run. AFAIK, you only need one license to multi-boot XP on a single computer (but you should check that!) so I don't see why it would be any different for multiple images run singly in a VM.
NB: I'm talking XP here; I vaguely recall something about the Vista EULA (spit!) specifically excluding installation in a non-MS VM, so you'd need to check with your lawyers on that one... :/I think I remember reading that they relaxed their VM licensing stance... Having never installed Vista and having no intention of touching it with a 10ft barge pole, I can't say I care! -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mandriva Linux Contributor [http://www.mandriva.com/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]