Re: For the RegExps gurus!

<Original message> From: _lallous <elias_bachaalany@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:28:03PM +0200 Message-ID: <20010906122527.9509.qmail@pb1.pair.com> Subject: Re: [PHP] For the RegExps gurus! > Thanks alot man! > > They are all still using /e switch... ;) </Original message> <Reply> Yep... still using /e switch. I'm not sure if there's a way to do this without using it. But I'm still pretty sure there's a better way then the three I've mentioned so far. But you know... fact is that I do have to work, so I don't have time to keep on trying nonstop. In between things I'm trying to figure out what's the best way to do this. I believe there's a better way, and I'm (also) trying to figure out a way to do it without /e. Btw... It's your job to try to proof the regexp's aren't correct. Try to find some weird construction in $mem that should be a valid URL but isn't matched/replaced by the regexp's. It's a necessary evil to (try to) proof what you have is wrong. Seems strange, but one should realy try hard to find a way to make one's own program's fail. Only then you can fix realy everything a make the most optimal program. So... if you find something where the regexp's fail: plz let me know. I don't have time to test the regexp's thoroughly. (sorry?!) </Reply> -- * R&zE: -- »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» -- Renze Munnik -- DataLink BV -- -- E: renze@datalink.nl -- W: +31 23 5326162 -- F: +31 23 5322144 -- M: +31 6 21811143 -- -- Stationsplein 82 -- 2011 LM HAARLEM -- Netherlands -- -- http://www.datalink.nl -- ««««««««««««««««««««««««