Re: For the RegExps gurus!

On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:37:58 +0200 impersonator of renze@datalink.nl (* R&Ze:) planted &I saw in php.general: >again. And believe me: IT'S A LOT OF RAIN HERE! > "Its raining back, Aleluia":) Like in UK reign in<G> "foggy Albion":)? I can understand you, I used to live in St. Petersburg.. Or do you mean that you visited Monaco (Isn't it a Rein`e - a rulling family there?:) & lost a fortune?:) > >'Silly me'; don't think so. The number of abbr's is pretty huge on Thank you for comforting me:) _That_ was what I had in mind (+coquetry:) writing (not _thinking_) this, of course:) >And this is where the misunderstanding came up. I thought you were >talking about the construction I was using, while you were - and >correct me if I'm wrong - talking about the characters I allowed. Well, as far as i am concerned, these two can not be separated for such issues. This IS functionality of the script, applied to what it needs done. (Its _not_ like separating a messenger from a message, which _idealy_, should always be performed, provided the MSG is independent of messenger <-[quite seldom, unfortunately, in our "team work" times]) >And concerning those, it might very well be that I don't only allow >characters allowed by specifications and even maybe I don't allow >characters allowed by specifications. I didn't spend much time on >that point. What I did was just creating the RE to parse the URL's. >The allowed characters weren't really of my concern then. > So, the "URL's" is not the right word here, then:) And th WAY, you did it, (even irrelevant of character set, as far, as it could be) - I compared with mine (not yours previous) - and havn't found, what I can improve. Believe me, if i see s/t usefull for me, i would use it, as long as it is not copyrighted:) >Let me know... > Just did. Best regards. -- i leonid http://nux.home.dk3.com