Re: For the RegExps gurus!

From: Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 16:43:24 +0000
Subject: Re: For the RegExps gurus!
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-66443@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:39:37 +0200 impersonator of renze@datalink.nl (* R&Ze:) planted &I saw in php.general: ><Original message> >From: ~~~i LeoNid ~~ <nux@hosting.front.ru> >Date: Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:30:44PM +0000 >Message-ID: <3b97b222.78196206@localhost> >Subject: Re: [PHP] For the RegExps gurus! > >> You can keep improving:) or you can use piece of my working (except for >> $Harlem, to which i am not going:) code (I give it for free this time:) >> >> No /me, no ereg, no nothing - gentleMen:)-just /i (did you miss it, btw?:) > ></Original message> > ><Reply> > >If you look at the stuff you sent you'll understand why I improved >it. > You didn't. Actually please expose - tell i tell i:). I am all ears:) >Btw... why the h*ll do you explode() the string you're matching, >while there's the /m modifier? You're making it to difficult for >yourself (and others). No need for the messy solution you created... Well. So much fuss of so little issue. I admit, It was just a quick addition for the posting without much thinking (may be just to add $Harlem variable:). You can do without exploding - and no need for other code alterations there, I believe. No need in /m either (Correct me, if I am wrong:), coz I am not checking on beginning or end of string. What other "mess" you have noticed:) >Just use RE's that are as simple as possible. It has the best >performance and it reads a lot easier. > ? RE ? Sorry, I am not a club insider:) Please, ></Reply>

« previous php.general (#66443) next »