Re: REPRASED: Supported platforms comparison
| From: | Marco Fioretti | Date: | Fri, 12 Oct 2001 07:17:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: REPRASED: Supported platforms comparison | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-70885@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> From netcraft.com:
>
> Microsoft Windows has a significantly higher share of the web when one
> counts by computer, rather than by host, as in the conventional Web Server
> Survey.
.....
> Windows is most popular with end-user and
> self hosted sites, where the host to computer ratio is much smaller.
>
or, in other words, windows is so inefficient that the Net as it is
today would require much less hosts, i.e. cost much less, if it
disappeared, right?
Sorry, I know perfectly that this is on the flaming side and has
nothing to do with my own original message, but the hunch was too good
to give it up...
Ciao,
Marco Fioretti
postingcouldn't resist