Re: Better known PHP users list

From: Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 15:20:54 +0000
Subject: Re: Better known PHP users list
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-7284@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
ccbill.com uses php for all their webmaster billing stats. Jeff Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > I actually have some code in the works to revamp the sites listing along > with a couple of other parts of php.net. I revisit it every now and > then. At some point I am going to have to force myself to sit down and > finish it. Something more important always seems to come along. > > -Rasmus > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Baurjan Ismagulov wrote: > > > hi, > > > > this is certainly a good thing, but imho, it suffers from the same problems that an > > official list do: > > 1. there's no concrete urls clearly demonstrating the usage of php. > > 2. it would be also nice to have (at least estimated) percentage of php usage on the site > > (e.g., the ratio |php-generated pages| / |all displayable pages|). > > > > many customers are curious about the "technology" used in their web sites, and > > get confused when they hear "php". much effort is needed to convince them, since they: > > 1. want good-looking site. seems that to show another "good" site using php is > > enough. > > 2. want "speed", whatever is meant by it. one can't explain the distinction > > between bandwidth, web server, application server, database server -- customers don't like > > things they don't understand. to show a "fast" site is not enough -- concrete > > benchmarks are needed. > > 3. want maintainability. they tend to think that with asp or other visual tool they > > don't need to hire qualified staff. the argument of the manager is "in an emergency even > > me (even a hardware technician) can fix it". this one is difficult. how would one show the > > equivalence of the maintenance to a person with strong prejudices / bias towards "visual" > > tools? > > > > i think that php will spread faster if we can deliver these issues to our customers' > > minds. and "ubiquitous" means "popular". > > > > i use a different account to read this list, so please cc the replies (if any) to me. > > > > with best regards, > > baurjan. > > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 07:01:46PM -0700, Chris Adams wrote: > > > Just in case anyone else is running into the "Who's using PHP?" > > > questions > > > from clients, I've compiled a short list of some better known sites which > > > use PHP. The focus is on name recognition since a certain subset of the > > > client population care more about doing what everyone else is doing rather > > > than considering what's best for their needs. I've added some of the sites > > > mentioned on the recent thread on this list. As always, corrections or > > > additions are strongly encouraged. > > > > > > http://gateway.digitaria.com/~chris/php/sites.html > > > > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net

« previous php.general (#7284) next »