Re: Better known PHP users list
| From: | Jeff Wolkove | Date: | Wed, 19 Jul 2000 15:20:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Better known PHP users list | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-7284@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
ccbill.com uses php for all their webmaster billing stats.
Jeff
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> I actually have some code in the works to revamp the sites listing along
> with a couple of other parts of php.net. I revisit it every now and
> then. At some point I am going to have to force myself to sit down and
> finish it. Something more important always seems to come along.
>
> -Rasmus
>
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Baurjan Ismagulov wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > this is certainly a good thing, but imho, it suffers from the same problems that an
> > official list do:
> > 1. there's no concrete urls clearly demonstrating the usage of php.
> > 2. it would be also nice to have (at least estimated) percentage of php usage on the site
> > (e.g., the ratio |php-generated pages| / |all displayable pages|).
> >
> > many customers are curious about the "technology" used in their web sites, and
> > get confused when they hear "php". much effort is needed to convince them, since they:
> > 1. want good-looking site. seems that to show another "good" site using php is
> > enough.
> > 2. want "speed", whatever is meant by it. one can't explain the distinction
> > between bandwidth, web server, application server, database server -- customers don't like
> > things they don't understand. to show a "fast" site is not enough -- concrete
> > benchmarks are needed.
> > 3. want maintainability. they tend to think that with asp or other visual tool they
> > don't need to hire qualified staff. the argument of the manager is "in an emergency even
> > me (even a hardware technician) can fix it". this one is difficult. how would one show the
> > equivalence of the maintenance to a person with strong prejudices / bias towards "visual"
> > tools?
> >
> > i think that php will spread faster if we can deliver these issues to our customers'
> > minds. and "ubiquitous" means "popular".
> >
> > i use a different account to read this list, so please cc the replies (if any) to me.
> >
> > with best regards,
> > baurjan.
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 07:01:46PM -0700, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > Just in case anyone else is running into the "Who's using PHP?"
> > > questions
> > > from clients, I've compiled a short list of some better known sites which
> > > use PHP. The focus is on name recognition since a certain subset of the
> > > client population care more about doing what everyone else is doing rather
> > > than considering what's best for their needs. I've added some of the sites
> > > mentioned on the recent thread on this list. As always, corrections or
> > > additions are strongly encouraged.
> > >
> > > http://gateway.digitaria.com/~chris/php/sites.html
> >
> >
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net