Re: [SPAM] Re: [PHP-GTK-DEV] E_STRICT renamings
| From: | Steph Fox | Date: | Sat, 02 Sep 2006 12:29:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [SPAM] Re: [PHP-GTK-DEV] E_STRICT renamings | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.gtk.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-dev+get-3379@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I missed a word - 'structure'. Basically in ZE we get the rules laid down for what PHP will or will not allow. There isn't a problem there, there's a problem in the (new) clash between there and our third-party GTK objects. But you're wrong about it affecting functionality, or at least I can't see how you're right. Put it this way, if you create a GtkWindow and call mnemonic_activate() from it, it worked before your patch.
'The Engine problem' is that it defines the relationships.Evidently it's nothing to do with the E_STRICT, which is only thrown if you turn on something in php.ini that is off by default.If one thinks about it, yes, the E_STRICT warnings are only a distant symptom of the engine problem.-- Regards/MfG, Christian Weiske-- PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php