Re: Status of PHP-GTK
| From: | Benjamin Smith | Date: | Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:26:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Status of PHP-GTK | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.gtk.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-general+get-8373@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I offer some counter points, here...
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 06:53:48 Bob Majdak Jr wrote:
> Coding is really limping along just fine. Tonnes of people hate the
> docs, less than tonnes offer to help, none of them actually do.
Sometime ago, I was offered the opportunity to update the docs, and was
picturing that it would be something like a fancy wiki or somesuch. Instead, I
was introduced to text files with a very complicated tagging system and a steep
learning curve. I don't remember what it was, it's been a few years, and I'm
sure there are good reasons for choosing it.
After struggling for some hours over a few days on it (and even starting a
docs editor in PHP-GTK to manage some of the complexity) I threw in the towel
and resigned myself to leaving (hopefully helpful) comments.
Can this be made simpler? Do you know of some kind of doc-editor manager
doohickey to take track all the tagging?
> Granted
> extra coders would help but patch writers are easier to come across than
> people actually willing to do the docs. And the coders can usually
> figure out what to do by knowing GTK in C or by looking at the C GTK
> manual.
Get_class_methods() and get_object_vars(), and Google are my substitutes. I
make it a point to leave notes when I can.
> The PHP doc system i am sure is not going anywhere, and personally I
> like comments off, it is a manual not a wbe forum. That is one of the
> things I hate the most about the actual PHP docs, especally when a new
> guy posts a code sample that is horrid and the next 20 posts are people
> saying "oh hay i made this better". I am not being bitter. Honest.
It's common for me to be baffled by minimalist docs, only to find a comment that
makes it all clear... I'm perfectly willing to ignore the crappy, 3-page-long
code samples in order to have the nuggets that make my day! And sometimes,
even the 3-page-long crappy code gives enough detail about how to use XYX
function that it's useful.
...perhaps a moderation system for comments?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.