Re: Status of PHP-GTK

From: Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:07:11 +0000
Subject: Re: Status of PHP-GTK
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.gtk.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-gtk-general+get-8376@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Even if PHP.NET would allow any of these options, who is going to implement it? And then who is going to populate it? It might get done at first, but I would be willing to wager it gets done once and just like the current docs once it is out of date everyone disappears. (Actually, I wager it gets half done). I have no idea what the current system is like, I just know somewhere someone is making the executive decision to stay with what is there. - bob On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Keith Roberts <keith@karsites.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Benjamin Smith wrote: > >> To: php-gtk-general@lists.php.net >> From: Benjamin Smith <bens@effortlessis.com> >> Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK] Status of PHP-GTK >> >> I offer some counter points, here... >> >> On Wednesday 15 April 2009 06:53:48 Bob Majdak Jr wrote: >>> >>> Coding is really limping along just fine. Tonnes of people hate the >>> docs, less than tonnes offer to help,  none of them actually do. >> >> Sometime ago, I was offered the opportunity to update the docs, and was >> picturing that it would be something like a fancy wiki or somesuch. >> Instead, I >> was introduced to text files with a very complicated tagging system and a >> steep >> learning curve. I don't remember what it was, it's been a few years, and >> I'm >> sure there are good reasons for choosing it. >> >> After struggling for some hours over a few days on it (and even starting a >> docs editor in PHP-GTK to manage some of the complexity) I threw in the >> towel >> and resigned myself to leaving (hopefully helpful) comments. >> >> Can this be made simpler? Do you know of some kind of doc-editor manager >> doohickey to take track all the tagging? > > Maybe something like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LyX > > would suffice, if only PDF documentation was needed? > > Kind Regards, > > Keith Roberts > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Websites: > http://www.php-debuggers.net > http://www.karsites.net > http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk > > All email addresses are challenge-response protected with > TMDA [http://tmda.net] > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > >> >>> Granted >>> extra coders would help but patch writers are easier to come across than >>> people actually willing to do the docs. And the coders can usually >>> figure out what to do by knowing  GTK in C or by looking at the C GTK >>> manual. >> >> Get_class_methods() and get_object_vars(), and Google are my substitutes.. >> I >> make it a point to leave notes when I can. >> >>> The PHP doc system i am sure is not going anywhere, and personally I >>> like comments off, it is a manual not a wbe forum.  That is one of the >>> things I hate the most about the actual PHP docs, especally when a new >>> guy posts a code sample that is horrid and the next 20 posts are people >>> saying "oh hay i made this better". I am not being bitter. Honest. >> >> It's common for me to be baffled by minimalist docs, only to find a >> comment that >> makes it all clear... I'm perfectly willing to ignore the crappy, >> 3-page-long >> code samples in order to have the nuggets that make my day! And sometimes, >> even the 3-page-long crappy code gives enough detail about how to use XYX >> function that it's useful. >> >> ...perhaps a moderation system for comments? >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> believed to be clean. >> >> >> -- >> PHP-GTK General Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > > -- > PHP-GTK General Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >

« previous php.gtk.general (#8376) next »