RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Thu, 01 May 2008 22:15:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.i18n php.pecl.cvs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-i18n+get-1165@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
The mailing list to the best of my knowledge can be subscribed to also
by the general public but I do think it makes more sense to have these
discussions on php-i18n@lists.php.net based on
http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php.
Please everyone only use that mailing list from now on.
Andi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 12:23 PM
> To: Ed Batutis; Andi Gutmans
> Cc: pecl-cvs@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc
> grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c
> /intl/tests grapheme.phpt
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Ed Batutis <ed@batutis.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I use "you" for all intl developers :) We sent many many mails
> (this
> > > list and internals) about the poor naming of these new functions
> and
> > > got zero reply so far.
> >
> > Personally I think the naming is OK - maybe not perfect, but what
is
> > perfect? Anyway, there was a long discussion about this on the php-
> icu list.
> > I think that's where you might want to post your thoughts.
>
> How ironic, this list is still private despite our discussions. I
> think that that helps me to finally (re)consider intl.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Pierre
> http://blog.thepimp.net |
> http://www.libgd.org