RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt

From: Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 22:15:27 +0000
Subject: RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.i18n php.pecl.cvs 
Request: Send a blank email to php-i18n+get-1165@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
The mailing list to the best of my knowledge can be subscribed to also by the general public but I do think it makes more sense to have these discussions on php-i18n@lists.php.net based on http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php. Please everyone only use that mailing list from now on. Andi > -----Original Message----- > From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 12:23 PM > To: Ed Batutis; Andi Gutmans > Cc: pecl-cvs@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc > grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c > /intl/tests grapheme.phpt > > Hi Ed, > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Ed Batutis <ed@batutis.com> wrote: > > > > > I use "you" for all intl developers :) We sent many many mails > (this > > > list and internals) about the poor naming of these new functions > and > > > got zero reply so far. > > > > Personally I think the naming is OK - maybe not perfect, but what is > > perfect? Anyway, there was a long discussion about this on the php- > icu list. > > I think that's where you might want to post your thoughts. > > How ironic, this list is still private despite our discussions. I > think that that helps me to finally (re)consider intl. > > Regards, > -- > Pierre > http://blog.thepimp.net | > http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.i18n (#1165) next »