Re: RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Fri, 02 May 2008 06:57:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.i18n php.pecl.cvs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-i18n+get-1167@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi!
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Texin, Tex <Tex.Texin@netapp.com> wrote:
> For some reason when I changed my subscriptions a few weeks ago, they didn't take.
> I resubscribed to internals and i18n yesterday and it seems to be working now.
>
> As I recall we discussed the naming and Stas did reply to the list with the rationale.
> There may not have been agreement with the rationale, but it was stated.
I can't find a discussion about that.
> If you think the naming is ok, I wonder why it is still being discussed....
>
> I have changed companies and e-mails so I am a bit out of the loop. Can someone tell me where
> we are at?
For what I understand and see, there is (still) the php-icu list which
is not public, not under lists.php.net, has no pbulic way to
subscribe. That's what Bjori, other (me included) has been argued
about since weeks now. The php-i18n list was dead until recently but
the big issue here is the discussions about intl happening outside
the public space.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org