Re: RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt

From: Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 06:57:03 +0000
Subject: Re: RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.i18n php.pecl.cvs 
Request: Send a blank email to php-i18n+get-1167@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi! On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Texin, Tex <Tex.Texin@netapp.com> wrote: > For some reason when I changed my subscriptions a few weeks ago, they didn't take. > I resubscribed to internals and i18n yesterday and it seems to be working now. > > As I recall we discussed the naming and Stas did reply to the list with the rationale. > There may not have been agreement with the rationale, but it was stated. I can't find a discussion about that. > If you think the naming is ok, I wonder why it is still being discussed.... > > I have changed companies and e-mails so I am a bit out of the loop. Can someone tell me where > we are at? For what I understand and see, there is (still) the php-icu list which is not public, not under lists.php.net, has no pbulic way to subscribe. That's what Bjori, other (me included) has been argued about since weeks now. The php-i18n list was dead until recently but the big issue here is the discussions about intl happening outside the public space. Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.i18n (#1167) next »