Re: RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Texin, Tex <Tex.Texin@netapp.com> wrote: > I am not on the php-icu list, but from my understanding of the state of the project and the > players that are working on it, there isn't much to discuss. Even if there was only this discussion: On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Ed Batutis <ed@batutis.com> wrote: > > Personally I think the naming is OK - maybe not perfect, but what is > perfect? Anyway, there was a long discussion about this on the php-icu list. > I think that's where you might want to post your thoughts. It is already too much. > It is pretty well baked. (Or so I hope. I thought this would ship last Nov. I can't > believe it is May already.) To be honest, I really don't understand why you took so long to develop what I see in intl now and here. I don't consider it well baked either, it is not bad but also not good. Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org