Re: intl 1.0.0RC1

Hi Stas, Am Montag, den 02.06.2008, 08:36 +0300 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev: > Well, what if they have classes named IntlNumberFormatter? There can > be all kinds of classes, and until we have standard namespace for > internal classes we have to live with names being global and make them > sufficiently distinct to avoid collisions. I think NumberFormatter is > sufficiently distinct. There might be classes like IntlNumberFormatter and someones business could be set at risk by a nuke but both are not very likely, so people normally ignore the nuke scenario. In the same way I think it is not so realistic to have a IntlNumberFormatter but a NumberFormatter is much more realistic. Would you accept a patch to prefix everything with an intl-Prefix? cu, Lars

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil signature.asc