Re: intl 1.0.0RC1
| From: | Norbert Lindenberg ☮ | Date: | Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:34:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: intl 1.0.0RC1 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.i18n |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-i18n+get-1266@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I like Guillaume's proposal - use Collator and Locale as is for 5.2, make them Intl::Collator and Intl::Locale when namespaces are available, i.e., from 5.3.
Would that work for everybody? How much effort is it to implement this?
Norbert
On Jun 10, 2008, at 02:44 , Guillaume Rossolini wrote:
Hi, Here's my user point of view, if you don't mind. I think your argument is about namespaces, which will be in 6 but not 5.2... So you might want to have IntCollator and IntLocale in 5.2 to avoid possible collisions, but you would rather have something like Intl::Collator and Intl::Locale from 5.3 and 6 onward. I guess the question is: can you bear with Collator and Locale until we have namespaces? I know I can. Guillaume Rossolini------------------------------------- Norbert Lindenberg Yahoo! Internationalization Architect