Re: [INTERNALS-WIN] [PATCH] Static dependency errors

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Steph Fox <steph@php.net> wrote: > > Actually, reviewing what you wrote there... Can I suggest to slow the replies? Mails !== IRC. It is hard to have a senseful discussion without misunderstanding when the full answer is splited in many mails within a few minutes. >> As part of online discussion and IRC, we already define this behavior. >> It was also discussion to have different levels of configure errors >> (warning, fatal, etc.). The idea is also to display only the relevant >> information and it is what the summary begin to do (while leaving the >> possibility to have a verbose and noisy output as now). > Perhaps the best plan is for me to wait until you commit your stuff and then > look again at applying something similar to this. The logic's there, it > would be trivial to adapt it to whatever you have up your sleeve. Yes, if what your patch does is not covered (but I'm 99.99% it is). > The biggest concern of course is time... And we are well aware of that as we begun the work months ago already (see the wiki). -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org