Re: [INTERNALS-WIN] [PATCH] Static dependency errors
| From: | Steph Fox | Date: | Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:11:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERNALS-WIN] [PATCH] Static dependency errors | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals.win |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals-win+get-93@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
Just trying to avoid embarrassing you. So that'll be a 'no' then.ps (off-list) Did you actually try it?Please post all replies to the list.
I read it and it does partially why I'm working on. The only reason why I did not commit is the recent decisions and updates. We have soon a deadlines and many dependencies and builds have to be tested and validated before.Surely that's a good reason to commit now, so everyone can test?
It will be committed early next week (certainly Monday evening or Tuesday evening). You can then play with it. However the idea is to have a clear list of everything relevant happening during a configure call: - Error(s), fatal or warnings like dep or header not found for which ext - Requested feature can't be enabled - List of enabled features (ext, sapi, etc.), partially done already and in cvs - QA validation check for release processYou're talking entirely about the summary here I take it? In this case yes, I definitely do need to wait for your commit before submitting a patch for this.
Yes but the whole point is to kill complexity further down the line. Yours works, but it works in a way that means others (e.g. across PECL) have to rewrite their own. Mine works in a way that negates the need for that.You can do that right now already.goodness, you can now build php without having any library available but resolv.lib (and this one will be dropped soon as well).You can do that with my patch, too.
They are logic, it has been discussed (by you) since my very commit about such change. Can we move on please?There are actually good reasons for my objection, Pierre. I'm not saying it just to upset you.
What was all that about not discussing things off-list again? ;) - StephCould you point me to some discussion of this upcoming error level and logging option?See the list archives (it is not that big) and the IRC logs if there is any (no idea here).