Re: RFC Abolish Narrow Margins

Hi! > Let me reply to the last point first, because I think that's really the > crux here: The issue is not that this RFC is very urgent per se, it's that > it has already been delayed numerous times and it is imperative that we > prevent that from happening again. Since this issue was first raised, a That's understandable. But I think if we have an ongoing discussion now, waiting until this discussion comes to some conclusion or at least giving it some reasonable time to do so is a good thing. Note the "reasonable" part - it doesn't mean it should wait another 2 years. But if 2+ year old RFC is revived I think it's reasonable to wait a week or two with vote. Original margins were meant for situation where somebody puts up RFC and immediately proceeds to vote, not for situation where RFC lies dormant for 2 years, then revived and immediately proceeds to vote without most people even remembering what happened 2 years ago. I think in this case it's reasonable to wait a little bit - and I don't see a reason why not. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com