Re: Re: ZTS improvement idea
| From: | Joe Watkins | Date: | Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:39:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: ZTS improvement idea | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-104413@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Packages such as xampp, which are very widely used, bundle a thread safe
interpreter.
It's a fact that ZTS is important on Windows.
Cheers
Joe
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 16:22, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 11:57, Zeev Suraski <zeev@php.net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:26 AM Joe Watkins <krakjoe@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The ZTS build is very commonly used in Windows today
> > >
> >
> > Any idea why?
> >
>
>
> https://windows.php.net/ currently recommends using an NTS
> build with
> FastCGI, but there is (or was?) also an ISAPI module, i.e. the IIS
> equivalent of Apache mod_php.
>
> I think that requires / required ZTS, so that may be where the perception
> of "thread-safety is important for Windows users" comes from.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Rowan Collins
> [IMSoP]
>