Re: Capturing reasons for votes for historical sake?

> On Mar 17, 2020, at 4:44 AM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 17.03.2020 at 09:26, Nikita Popov wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 8:09 PM Jakob Givoni <jakob@givoni.dk> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 1:29 PM Mike Schinkel <mike@newclarity.net> wrote: >>>> If we had that we could list the reasons and the number of votes that >>> choose those reasons on the RFC for historical purposes. >>> >>> Thanks Mike, exactly what I was thinking when I started writing RFC: >>> COPA (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/compact-object-property-assignment)! >>> >>> As you can see in my "Voting" section, I had the idea to capture >>> reasons for no-votes, to document it in the outcome of the RFC, should >>> it fail. >>> It would have saved my research quite a bit if I had had the no-vote >>> reasons for the RFCs I reference at the bottom. >>> >>> +1 on the idea from me! >>> >> >> FWIW this has been discussed a few times already, and I believe the >> consensus is: We're happy to have *optional* reasons for votes, if someone >> actually implements it. >> >> For the number of times someone has brought this up on list, there has been >> a distinct lack of volunteers for actually making it happen ;) > > If anybody wants to take a stab at this, patching the doodle plugin[1] > would be the way to go. > > [1] > > <https://github.com/php/web-wiki/tree/master/dokuwiki/lib/plugins/doodlež3°ÈCQ > у1?ßeî> Ah, I see. So set up https://github.com/php/web-wiki locally and I'd have what I need? -Mike