Re: Capturing reasons for votes for historical sake?

On 18/03/2020 23:22, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:

I am not gonna personally answer a survey everytime I vote against a feature. This is why we have a discussion period to raise issues, of course not everyone will raise all their concerns to each and every RFC (me included, take the annotation RFCS posted over the years, they are awesome but the one thing I dislike is the syntax). I doubt everyone have time to go in details and understand to the teeth what each and every feature does.

If a person doesn't have the time or inclination to read into the details of an RFC, and also doesn't have time or inclination to engage in discussion about it, and also doesn't have the time or inclination to give even the briefest of justification about why they are casting their vote a particular way to help inform future discussion... Well, they shouldn't be casting a vote in the first place. That's not to suggest everyone should need to be able to analyse the patch line by line, but if a person is cleary *that* disengaged then IMO they should do the honourable thing and refrain from voting. MR.