Re: Capturing reasons for votes for historical sake?
| From: | Jakob Givoni | Date: | Thu, 19 Mar 2020 02:44:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Capturing reasons for votes for historical sake? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-109133@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 7:15 PM Mark Randall <marandall@php.net> wrote:
> Well, they shouldn't be casting a vote in the first place.
Hear! Hear!
Ok, I don't mean to be harsh, but rather to demonstrate a way that you can
express agreement with something someone else has said without repeating
it.
Maybe if more voters participated in discussions in this simple way, asking for
voting reasons post hoc would not come up time and time again...
Or to vary it:
- Ditto
- I agree
- True
- What (s)he said