Hi all,
I understand that is better to replicate syntax from another language, but the only valid syntax
seems to be the current one (Hack's <<>>).
The proposed syntax in this RFC is a new syntax that is not directly used in another language, but
an adaptation, and it includes a little BC break.
As we are creating new syntax, why not simply use another single symbol? Here are some examples:
*Deprecated
%Deprecated
>Deprecated
&Deprecated
function foo() { }
I'm not 100% sure if all this symbols could by used in that context, but I think I prefer any
of them rather than a double symbol.
Would it be possible to add a multioption vote and let people choose?
Regards,
Iván Arias.