Re: [RFC][Discussion] Objects can be declared falsifiable

From: Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:59:38 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC][Discussion] Objects can be declared falsifiable
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-111027@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hey Larry, <http://ocramius.github.com/> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 6:55 PM Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote: > I disagree entirely. The value of a Maybe over just null is > > 1) You can bind to it even if the result is empty; the "if is null" check > gets abstracted away from the main code. > That's correct: that's how the Maybe monad works too. > 2) You are forced to unwrap/extract the value if you're not just binding, > which makes it less likely you'll forget to check if it's null No need to unwrap: that's what >>= does for you. Assuming you use psalm or phpstan, a program that doesn't use >>=, or forgets to check for null on ?T does not type-check anyway, and can be rejected before even writing any runtime tests: that's sound. Marco Pivetta http://twitter.com/Ocramius http://ocramius.github.com/

« previous php.internals (#111027) next »