Re: [RFC] Random Extension 3.0

My apologies. I had skipped one. > And either way it needs more clarity about how you'd write one for reals. Added a simple example comparing it to mt_rand. What do you think of this? 2021年9月3日(金) 3:26 Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>: > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021, at 10:10 AM, Go Kudo wrote: > > Hi Internals. > > > > Expanded from the previous RFC and changed it to an RFC that organizes > the > > whole PHP random number generator. Also, the target version has been > > changed to 8.2. > > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension > > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/7453 > > > > Hopefully you will get some good responses. > > > > Regards, > > Go Kudo > > This looks pretty nice to my unskilled eye. Two questions. > > 1) Why is the number generator a parent class rather than an interface? > It seems like an interface target. And either way it needs more clarity > about how you'd write one for reals. (It returns an int, so does that mean > getBytes() just derives from a series of ints?) > > 2) You don't mention the CSPRNG functions at all. Is there any intention > to fold those into this model as well, or to leave those as is? Or is the > Secure generator implementation intended to replace those? It's unclear > here. > > --Larry Garfield > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php > >